
Front Page
News
Previews
Reviews
Features
Gamer Life
Feedback
On the Edge
Sony Monopoly
Driving Discrimination
Great British Games Console
Piracy-Proof Prices
PC vs Consoles... The End
In Support of Bits
Future Gamer Should Split
Europe Missing Out
An Apology… Almost

Charts
Release Schedule
Next Week
Paper View
On the website

Chat forum
Demos and Patches
Hints and Tips...
PC
PlayStation
N64



|
 |
 |
|
| |
| Feedback |
| PC vs Consoles... The End |
Dear Future Gamer
In response to Alexander Moller's letter (FG35) advocating the removal of console games from the magazine to focus wholly on PC games, I find his opinion puzzling to say the least.
I have a PC, N64 and PSX, and enjoy playing games on all for different reasons. I read Edge every month and Future Gamer every week and I don't skip the reviews of games on formats I don't own. The contrasts and similarities between formats are fascinating. Indeed, the cross-fertilisation is the key to a constantly evolving computer games scene.
How many ideas have been borrowed from one format to appear on another? How often when reading reviews of new games do we see console game elements in a PC game and vice versa? How far do we take it? Do we ignore a game on the PC because it's too 'consoley'? Does Alexander vet his purchases thoroughly for console gameplay elements before he buys? I think not.
Alexander doesn't appear to have any real interest in games per se, and most probably thinks that good games have to run on a 550MHz Pentium III with a Voodoo3 graphics card. Alexander, just because the screenshots look good, that doesn't necessarily make it a good game.
Anyway, why am I concerned about the opinion of someone who thinks an N64 joypad is an inferior control method to a keyboard and a mouse?
Steve Wright
FG:
That's what we've thought all along, Steve. Alexander created a bit of a stir with his letter but he's been fully put straight so it's time to move on to other subjects.
Got an opinion or a question? Write to me at andy.smith@futurenet.co.uk...
|
|