
Front Page
News
Sony Confirms GT2 Date
X-Box X-plained?
The Emulator Strikes Back
Eidos and Disney Join Hands
Square's Y2K Line-up
Dreamcast Xmas Pack
The 64DD Hits Japan
ISS For PlayStation2 Launch?
Sega Reveal New Details on Dreamcast Crazy Taxi
Dolphin Zelda in Five Years
Brazilian Judge Bans Six Games
Hasbro Respond to MicroProse Rumours
First Details on Virtua Striker 2000 PAL Conversion
Railroad Tycoon II Announced for PlayStation
De Poche Monstres?
Online Horse Racing Sim For Japanese Dreamcast
Under Fire
Quake III Editing Tools Released
Two US Retailers Begin PS2 Pre-Orders
Nibbles

Previews
Reviews
Mini-Reviews
Features
Gamer Life
Feedback
Charts
Release Schedule
Next Week
Paper View
On the website

Chat forum
Demos and Patches
Hints and Tips...
PC
PlayStation
N64

|
 |
 |
| Issue 58 - December 16, 1999
|
|
| |
| News |
| The Emulator Strikes Back |
Bleem counterclaim against Sony
The ongoing battle between Sony Computer Entertainment of America and the makers of the bleem! PlayStation emulator has entered a new phase, following a series of rulings in favour of the smaller company. Of particular note, Judge Charles A Legge granted Bleem's motion for leave to amend and assert counterclaims against the electronics giant.
This decision comes after a week in which Sony stepped up their efforts against Bleem. They served subpoenas on ten of Bleem's biggest retail clients, demanding detailed information regarding purchasing, sales, promotion and profits resulting from sales of the bleem! Emulator.
"What we have here is a pretty transparent attempt by Sony to intimidate the retailers into pulling bleem! from their shelves," said Jon Hangartner, lead attorney for Bleem. "Even if Sony's subpoenas weren't invalid on their face, the information they request is irrelevant to the lawsuit. These subpoenas have nothing to do with potential damages; they only serve to scare bleem!'s vendors into thinking they might be Sony's next target."
But can the spunky little upstart afford to go head-to-head with Sony indefinitely? We reckon they'll be hoping for a sprint rather than a marathon.
|
|